Thank you for Subscribing to Insurance Business Review Weekly Brief
Andrea Kirkland, Vice President of OperationsA contents claim may start with a simple list of damaged belongings, but an entry like a brush can fail to help identify whether the item is a toothbrush, hairbrush or toilet brush. Without that detail, accurate identification and valuation become difficult. When that extends throughout a household, the contents portion becomes a source of rework and delay, especially on larger or more complex losses.
edjuster brings structure to contents claims by combining dedicated contents teams with its digital platform, E-xclaim. Together, they provide a consistent process for creating, reviewing and valuing inventories, regardless of who collects the information.
“Contents claims demand our full attention,” says Andrea Kirkland, vice president of operations. “That commitment means mastering the work and bringing the discipline and empathy policyholders need.”
It operates coast-to-coast, with regional teams rolling up through a shared leadership structure, giving insurers consistency irrespective of the individual collecting the inventory. Insurers determine how much responsibility edjuster assumes, adding support without transferring ownership of the broader claim.
Standardizing the Valuation Process
E-xclaim serves as the central hub where inventories are created, reviewed and valued, regardless of whether the information originates from a field or desk team, contractor or policyholder. edjuster’s workflow adds class and type, aging and pricing information before producing like, kind and quality (LKQ) replacement matches and reports.
For higher-frequency claims, it offers a digital service. In case of complex claims, edjuster takes ownership and removes administrative work from adjusters. Its desk service adds further policyholder touchpoints when a list requires additional involvement, including checking for duplicate items and confirming that item details provide enough information for an LKQ match.
-
Contents claims demand our full attention. That commitment means mastering the work and bringing the discipline and empathy policyholders need.
The team also performs quality assurance checks on claims to ensure that aging, class and type information and LKQ matching are applied consistently throughout the claim.
Automated pricing uploads receive human review, with sources localized by province and aligned with available retailers.
Integrating Contents Services into Existing Workflows
Insurers have the option to use E-xclaim via its software-asa-service offering. Internal teams may collect information through the policyholder portal and manage claims in E-xclaim, involving edjuster only where needed. A collectibles team, for example, can address a specialized collection without taking control of the broader claim. edjuster's role within an insurer’s workflow depends on claim segmentation, internal adjuster capacity, communication cadence and clear ownership of each step. Information can be submitted through email, web forms, direct integrations or E-xclaim.
Communication follows a weekly, biweekly or end-ofclaim cadence, depending on how the insurer wants information managed. Bringing edjuster into the process earlier can reduce duplicate lists, mixed restorable contents and the unpacking needed to capture data.
A program developed collaboratively with a third-party administrator demonstrates the measurable effect of a structured approach. Different claims handlers had been evaluating contents across regions using varying approaches, creating compliance and evaluation challenges. edjuster built a program around E-xclaim and assumed part of the administrative workload.
The program recorded cycle times under 24 hours on 98 percent of claims and approximately 40 percent ROI. edjuster’s involvement also reduced administrative demands on the client, easing the burden on claims handlers.
That balance of control, efficiency and human judgment underpins edjuster’s recognition as the Top Contents Claim Solutions in Canada 2026.
As contents claims move toward digital self-service, edjuster balances speed and ease with the accuracy, quality and controls the process requires. It gives adjusters more room to focus on settlement and coverage while keeping policyholders supported and informed through a difficult claim.
Matching Contents Claims Support to Claim Complexity
A contents claim can become expensive long before settlement when inventory work arrives incomplete, and adjusters spend time reconciling information that should have been resolved upstream. For insurers handling steady claim volumes, the cost is not limited to labor. Rework stretches cycle time and can create uneven policyholder experiences between regions. Complex losses raise a different concern. They require enough specialist judgment to distinguish routine inventory work from items that need closer review without turning every claim into a heavily managed file.
Service design should match claim severity rather than force one handling model across the book. Lower-severity losses may justify a digital path that moves an existing inventory quickly into review and pricing. Larger or more emotionally difficult losses can require direct contact, field involvement, structured inventory development and specialist review. The useful question is how easily an insurer can move between those levels of support. A provider that cannot vary its role may either add unnecessary handling to simple claims or leave adjusters carrying too much work on complex ones.
Inventory quality deserves equal scrutiny, as downstream valuation is only as usable as the item record behind it. Descriptions need enough detail to support like-kind-and-quality matching, while duplicate entries and inconsistent depreciation treatment can distort the file. Pricing automation can speed review, but unattended automation is a poor substitute for controls on unusual items or ambiguous matches. Human review remains relevant where the item type or replacement basis is not straightforward. Buyers should look for a process that preserves a consistent valuation method while allowing specialist intervention when the claim requires it.
“edjuster’s Exclaim platform centralizes item inventories and valuation while supporting localized pricing and claim-level collaboration.”
Workflow fit is also a purchasing issue, particularly for insurers that already have established claims systems and service-level expectations. Referrals should not depend on manual workarounds that make adjusters chase another inbox. File status also has to remain visible enough for the insurer to understand what has been completed and what still needs attention. Integration and ownership matter equally. Insurers need a clear division of work between the adjuster and contents specialist, supported by communication rules that fit the claim model rather than an imposed cadence.
A useful arrangement reduces adjuster administration without removing the judgment insurers still need to retain. That balance becomes more important during claim surges, when staffing pressure can turn small process weaknesses into reporting backlogs. A contents claims partner should absorb detailed inventory workload and preserve consistent claim handling across locations. It should also give carriers enough flexibility to keep straightforward files light-touch while escalating difficult losses.
edjuster fits this buying logic through a tiered contents claims model rather than a single service path. Its service range spans digital handling for high-frequency claims, software-as-a-service access to Exclaim, desk support and total contents field service. Its Exclaim platform centralizes item inventories and valuation while supporting localized pricing and claim-level collaboration.
Full-time contents specialists can review automated pricing, apply like-kind-and-quality matching, check valuation consistency and handle more detailed policyholder contact where the file warrants it. Field service adds onsite inventory and restorable versus non-restorable decisions for more complex losses. For insurers that need to shift work by claim severity while keeping reporting and valuation within one contents process, edjuster warrants consideration.
...Read more
